This week we did more proofs. It is very challenging but
interesting. However, I did have hard time understanding the proof of prime
number, because there are many underlying math knowledge.
If I came across this problem for the first time, I could think of using proof by contradiction. The general structure and first few steps were easy to come up. However, I would definitely get stuck on the fourth line of the proof. I had to know that prime number starts from 2. I felt this comment was not understandable, because I did not know why we could use this fact without proving it. There were more lines that I was confused with. The comment in the line 6 was not a fact that I could come up by myself.
The question that bothered me was that I did not know what math knowledge that we could use for granted, because I felt like other than some basic algebra knowledge, I had to prove anything in 165.
I still work on this proof and want to find a another to prove it without using those facts.
Great start, but please post more—especially in regards to problems you've found outside of the classroom. Prof. Heap has great suggestions on that!
ReplyDelete